« International Jury News | Main | Others Urge High Court to Take on 10-2 Verdicts »

May 28, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Greg Jones

If I remember correctly, the very ancient English practice was to add enough people to a split jury to gain a majority of twelve. For example, if the vote were split 10-2, four (or maybe 12) more jurors would have been added, hoping for a 14-2 result (or one of at least 18-6), regarded as good enough. So, very anciently, unanimity was sufficient for a verdict, but, in its absence, a big enough majority to satsify society that the correct result had been reached would do the trick.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog Editor, Prof. Hoffmeister

Blog powered by Typepad

Notices

  • Notices
    © Copyright 2014-2016 by Thaddeus Hoffmeister. All rights reserved

June 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30