Stephen Saltzburg
Abstract:
This article examines United States v. Moran-Toala, 726 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 2013), to illustrate what happens when a trial judge explicitly instructs a jury that its verdict need not be consistent.
« Silencing Grand Jury Witnesses | Main | A Jury of Your Peers? »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.